Obama Eligibility Case Requested To Move To Oral Arguments At US Supreme Court

Discussion in 'Politics and Religion' started by mmckee1952, Feb 17, 2013.

  1. mmckee1952

    mmckee1952 Well-Known Member

    53
    0

    Obama Eligibility Case Requested To Move To Oral ArgumentsAt US Supreme Court



    By: Tim Brown



    Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court was asked to movefrom conference to oral hearing concerning the Obama eligibility case. Dr. OrlyTaitz’s application, to be heard on behalf of Edward Noonan, was denied byJustice Kennedy on December 13, 2012. However, the application was refiled andresubmitted to the Chief Justice on December 26, 2012 and listed as“Distributed for Conference of Februrary 15, 2013, according to the SCOTUSwebsite.



    According to Suzanne Eovaldi, “February 15, 2013, AttorneyOrly Taitz brings her request to move the Obama eligibility challenge fromconference to the oral hearing stage at the US Supreme Court. She is movingforward in spite of the fact that four African-American Supreme Court clerksrefused to allow Taitz to see the signature of Justice Anthony Kennedy, whodenied her petition originally. ‘But I resubmitted to Justice Roberts, and hesent it to the conference,’ Taitz said.”



    “The California attorney is asking ‘…how do we know that he(Kennedy) ever saw the brief?’ Eovaldi writes. “In no uncertain terms, clerkJames Baldin told her that ‘I (Taitz) [was] not allowed to see the signature.’This denial of her right to see Kennedy’s signature ‘does not make any sense.’”



    “Attorney Taitz is presenting evidence that 1 1/2 millioninvalid voter registrations were filed in the state of California!” Eovaldiconcluded. “She is asking US citizens to ‘please, write and fax SCOTUS anddemand to see the order by Justice Anthony Kennedy, who allegedly originallydenied my case Noonan v Bowen before it was sent by Justice Roberts to theconference.’ Is not this the very least we can do to attempt to clear up thismatter?”



    Not only is the claim that the birth certificate postedonline at the White House website alleged to be a forgery and with good reasonto suspect so, but also Obama’s passport records have never been released norhas his college transcripts.



    Obama’s Connecticut Social Security Number Flagged ByE-Verify[/caption]Additionally there is the issue of his Social Security numberallegedly being from Connecticut. Marv Dumon writes,”The SSN apparently failsthe government’s own E-Verify system and generates the name ‘Harrison J.Bounel’. Bounel appears to be a relative of Michelle Robinson Obama. Theincidence was first reported in the mid-2000s when a background check wasconducted on Barack Obama when he was in the process of purchasing a home inChicago. The purchase became a public scandal when it was discovered that Obamahad received a favorable price (worth hundreds of thousands of dollars) on hismansion from a convicted felon and lobbyist.”





    Obama’s Connecticut Social Security Number Flagged ByE-Verify





    Concerned citizen and “employer” of Barack Obama, LindaJordan, even went so far as to write Obama to have him verify his information,after his Social Security number failed the government’s E-Verification.



    Keep in mind that only about one percent of cases such asthe one engaged in yesterday by Ms. Taitz are elevated for further review byall nine Supreme Court justices.



    On the day that Barack Obama was to deliver the State of theUnion address, Taitz declared that the Selective Service Certificate that isused by Barack Obama was never assigned to him.







    Taitz has not been the only investigation into the identityof Barack Obama. Most people are aware of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s investigation.Arpaio referred to the issue as a “national security” iissue. He even took hisinformation to delegates at the Republican National Convention in 2012.



    Even Christopher Monckton, commonly referred to as LordMonckton, expressed his insights into Obama’s birth certificate and eventuallydeclared him to be an illegal president.



    Obama’s attorney argued last year that the online birthcertificate is “irrelevant to his placement on the ballot” in the State of NewJersey, basically conceding that it was a forgery.



    Even Israeli science determined that Barack Obama’s onlinebirth certificate is a forgery.



    What is more amazing than people not looking at thisevidence seriously is the fact that Barack and Michelle Obama, along with theKenyan Ambassador have all openly declared that Kenya is his place of birth.Many other people have said that as well.



    Similar lawsuits are continuing in California and Washingtonagainst the man formerly known as Barry Soetoro.



    For a great Constitutional explanation of what the Foundershad in mind about the term “natural born citizen,” I suggest you take the timeto read Publius Huldah’s article on it.





    Read more:http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/02/o...-arguments-at-us-supreme-court/#ixzz2LDjstM2i