Trying to decide between the .380 plus and the BT9UP, any suggestions would be appreciated!
I see you wrote down BT9UP; I guess you meant BT9UC.
When I faced that same dillema, I looked into specs. and found out that UC9 is ever so slightly heavier (1.5 oz.) and wider (0.15") than 380 plus, which was negligable with respect to concealed carrying. Handle circumference is very close. Two round lesser capacity in UC9 is greatly offset by bigger caliber. The big advantige UC9 has is reliability, and I mean
big. Reports on 380 plus do not compare to the ones on UC9, there is much more mulfunctions being reported. UC9 controls are ambidextrious, has a good trigger and manegable recoil.
Now, weather all this will "fit your bill" is different question.

There is also that element of ergonomics that has to be taken into account.
I bought UC9 and .380CC at the same time, covered home defense and carrying during offsummer months with UC9 and deeper concealment and carrying during hot weather with CC380. Buying two guns at the same time from out of house FFL dealer, I was able to negotiate price and save $50.
Both weapons performed very good so far. The objections I had were that CC380 is being sold with only one magazine and UC9 rear sights are somewhat substandard, dull in this case. Some do not share that opinion though. Here is a photo I took to substantiate my claim.
